Core i9-13900K 2022 24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt 38.33 Xeon w9-3475X 2023 36 cores / 72 threads, 300 Watt 42.16 +10% i3-12100F i5-13600K i9-14900KS Ryzen 5 5500 Ryzen 5 7500F Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i9-13900K by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results. i9-13900K Xeon w9-3475X Comparing Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price. Performance per price, higher is better. i9-13900K has 271% better value for money than Xeon w9-3475X. Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Information on Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here. Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X.Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X integrated GPUs. Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces. APIs supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X. Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. i9-13900K38.33 Xeon w9-3475X42.16 +10% Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i9-13900K by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results. Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption andphysics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Benchmark coverage: 68% i9-13900K59281 Xeon w9-3475X65211 +10% Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i9-13900K by 10% in Passmark. GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core. Benchmark coverage: 42% i9-13900K2982 +50.6% Xeon w9-3475X1980 Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon w9-3475X by 51% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core. GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores. Benchmark coverage: 42% i9-13900K20190 +15.6% Xeon w9-3475X17462 Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon w9-3475X by 16% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core. Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X. Note that Core i9-13900K is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3475X is a server/workstation one. Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900K and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU. Core i9-13900K Xeon w9-3475X Like Like We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. 3.81782 votes Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5: 4.47 votes Rate Xeon w9-3475X on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900K or Xeon w9-3475X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 71 49 Place by popularity not in top-100 not in top-100 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 67.41 18.16 Market segment Desktop processor Server Series Intel Core i9 no data Architecture codename Raptor Lake-S Sapphire Rapids Release date 27 September 2022 (1 year ago) 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) Launch price (MSRP) $589 no data Current price $619 (1.1x MSRP) $3918 Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Physical cores 24 (Tetracosa-Core) 36 Threads 32 72 Base clock speed 3 GHz 2.2 GHz Boost clock speed 5.7 GHz 4.8 GHz L1 cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core) L2 cache 2 MB (per core) 2 MB (per core) L3 cache 36 MB (shared) 82.5 MB Chip lithography Intel 7 nm Intel 7 nm Die size 257 mm2 4x 477 mm2 Maximum core temperature 100 °C 74 °C Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 74 °C 64 bit support + + Windows 11 compatibility + + Unlocked multiplier Yes Yes Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1 Socket FCLGA1700 FCLGA4677 Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 300 Watt Technologies and extensions
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 AES-NI + + AVX + + vPro + + Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) + + Speed Shift + + Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 2.0 Hyper-Threading Technology + + TSX no data + Idle States + no data Thermal Monitoring + no data SIPP + no data Turbo Boost Max 3.0 + + Status Launched Launched Security technologies
TXT + + EDB + + Secure Key + no data SGX no data - OS Guard + + Virtualization technologies
VT-d + + VT-x + + EPT + + Memory specs
Supported memory types DDR4, DDR5 DDR5-4800 Maximum memory size 192 GB 4 TB Max memory channels 2 8 Maximum memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s no data ECC memory support + + Graphics specifications
Integrated graphics card Intel UHD Graphics 770 no data Quick Sync Video + no data Clear Video HD + no data Graphics max frequency 1.65 GHz no data Execution Units 32 no data Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported 4 no data Graphics image quality
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz no data Max resolution over eDP 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz no data Max resolution over DisplayPort 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz no data Graphics API support
DirectX 12 no data OpenGL 4.5 no data Peripherals
PCIe version 5.0 and 4.0 5.0 PCI Express lanes 20 112 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Gaming performance
Pros & cons summary
Performance score 38.33 42.16 Recency 27 September 2022 1 January 2023 Physical cores 24 36 Threads 32 72 Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 300 Watt Vote for your favorite
![Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900K [3-Benchmark Showdown] (5)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/en/cpu_logotypes/1/image?thumbnail=yes&maxwidth=38&maxheight=38 "Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900K [3-Benchmark Showdown] (5)")
Similar processor comparisons
Community ratings
![Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900K [3-Benchmark Showdown] (29)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile_sad.png "Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900K [3-Benchmark Showdown] (29)")
![Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900K [3-Benchmark Showdown] (30)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile.png "Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900K [3-Benchmark Showdown] (30)")
Questions & comments
Core i913900K vsCore i913900KF
Xeon w93475X vsCore i914900KS
Core i913900K vsCore i914900KF
Core i913900K vsXeon w93495X
Core i913900K vsXeon Max9480
Core i913900K vsCore i913900TE
Core i913900K vsCore i913900E
Core i913900K vsXeon w73455
Core i913900K vsXeon w72495X
Core i913900K vsXeon w72475X
Core i913900K vsXeon w73445
![Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-13900K [3-Benchmark Showdown] (2024)]()